Yesterday I received a “voter report
card” from MoveOn.org. The report card
informed me that during the last five general elections, I voted only once
compared to my neighbors who had voted in more than one general election.
What annoyed me about this voter
report card was that it did not consider or possibly know that during the 2008
election, I lived and voted in Indiana.
In the 2000 election, I voted in Pennsylvania, but I lived in another
part of the city. However, with limited
information, MoveOn.org made assumptions about me that were not accurate. This got me thinking about the assumptions
made about public education and public schools.
There are a lot of assumptions made
about public education and public schools.
Assumptions about the effectiveness of public education, assumptions
about the teachers who work in public schools, and assumptions about the
students who attend public schools are often generalized to all schools, all
teachers and all students.
Since most assumptions are based on an
individual’s perception, speculation or interpretation of information, what an
individual reads, listens to, or engages in discussion, the information is
filtered and processed via their socio-economic lens and assumptions are
made. Since, a majority of the
information comes from non-objective sources, the individual fails to
understand their assumptions are based on partial information.
Assumptions by themselves are
innocuous. However when assumptions
develop or influence educational policy or affirm stereotypes of urban and
suburban schools and students, assumptions can be very harmful.
One such example is the assumption
of the underachieving urban, public school student. The assumption that urban, public school
students are poor, born out of wedlock, undereducated and involved in criminal
activity has been detrimental to these students as they apply for jobs. Unemployment and underemployment is extremely
high among urban, public school students because the assumptions made about
them have influenced the decision to hire them. Another example of how assumptions have been
detrimental is when these students apply to college, these assumptions have
hurt urban, public school students who are denied acceptance into top tier
colleges because colleges view their schools as academically inferior and they
do not believe these students have the skills to graduate in four years.
Finally, what is most disheartening is
the assumptions are likely to follow these students into their adulthood. Because of where they live and where they
graduated, these students are likely to become underemployed or unemployed
adults. These students should not be
judged on assumptions, they should be judged on their ability and potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment