The Chicago teachers strike has brought the
debate on teacher evaluations to the public.
While the teacher evaluation debate appeared to be discussed only among
those in the educational realm (teachers, administrators, educational advocates
and some politicians); the rest of the country did not seem to care about the
evaluations of teachers given the current state of the economy.
Many are wondering why there is such
upheaval over how teachers are evaluated.
The primary reason is that states are receiving pressure from
educational advocates and politicians to have a section of teacher evaluations
on the standardized test scores of their students. Teachers are not in favor of student test
scores being a part of their evaluation due to the socio-economic factors that
affect learning. Teachers do not feel it
is fair for them to be evaluated on the test scores of their students when some
students lack school readiness, have poor attendance, reading and other
academic deficits, and lack parent participation to increase academic
achievement. Additionally, teachers do
not feel it is fair to be held accountable for the ineffective instruction of a
students’ previous teachers.
The teachers have a strong argument
against having part of their evaluations include the test scores of their
students. However, there needs to be an
effective evaluation system that is fair to teachers and is able to isolate
ineffective instruction to support struggling teachers or to terminate them if
necessary. While teachers agree to improving
the teacher evaluation system, their ideas don’t offer the necessary change
required to develop an effective evaluation system. The current evaluation system where the
principal conducts classroom observations is no longer adequate. In order to effectively evaluate teachers,
states will have to look at alternative ways to determine teacher
effectiveness. Instead of evaluating
teachers based on test scores, states should consider these alternatives: 1)
evaluation of lesson plans and 2) evaluations from parents and students
perspective.
The evaluation of lesson plans is an
effective way to evaluate a teacher.
Lesson plans are written by the teacher and demonstrate the level of
content knowledge and instructional practice.
Additionally, lesson plans also demonstrate if the teacher provides
instruction to the various learning styles (auditory, visual, etc) and if
he/she is utilizing specifically designed instruction (SDI) for students with
disabilities. Finally, since many lesson
plans are due weekly or monthly to the principal, a principal is able to assess
over time the quality of instruction students are receiving.
The final alternative, parent and
student evaluations will likely be the most controversial and contested. The purpose for suggesting they are part of
the evaluation of teachers is that parents and students are an underutilized
and ignored knowledge resource in education.
For those who care about improving the teaching and instruction of our
children, they need to hear what parents and students have to say about their
experiences with the individuals responsible for grading, assessing, and
promotion of children. There will be
some who will claim that having parents and students evaluate them is unfair
because parents and/or students may give them a poor evaluation due to
receiving poor grades, being disciplined or suspended. As with any evaluation whenever you are
evaluated by your subordinates, there will honest evaluations and evaluations
based on retribution. However, only a
small weight percentage is assigned to the overall evaluation and a majority of
the time the positive and negative balance evaluations balance out to provide
an informative representation of a teachers’ strengths and areas of improvement.
If the goal is to develop a new
teacher evaluation system that is fair and accurately assesses a teachers’
strengths and areas of improvement, adding lesson plans and parent and student
perspective into the evaluation process will be vital to obtaining the data
needed to improve teacher effectiveness.
No comments:
Post a Comment