This
summer will be an important summer for public education. Public school districts across the country
will try to prevent their worst case scenario plans from coming to
fruition. As districts struggle with
less money to serve students next school year, difficult decisions will be made
that will affect instruction, school climate, and student activities.
School leaders will have to make
tough decisions on instruction that will affect several key areas. The first is class size. As districts close buildings and cuts school
staff, many districts have sought relief from the state for class size
regulations. The increase in class size
could greatly impact instruction and hamper a teachers’ ability to provide
quality and differentiated instruction all students need. Second, school leaders will have to decide on
if there should be a change to the school week?
To manage costs, there are a number of medium and small districts that
have shortened the school week from 5 days to 4 days. While shortening the school week has produced
mixed results, there is very little longitudinal data to determine if a
shortened school week will be a viable cost saving solution to budgetary
concerns. A final instruction concern is
whether to keep certain academic interventions that provide supplemental aid to
students who are struggling with the core curriculum content and standardized
assessments. To increase scores on
standardized tests and improve overall knowledge of the core content, districts
spend a lot of money on costly academic interventions that are beginning to
show improvement. The decision to keep
costly interventions may lead the termination of other things that might be
considered equally important.
School
climate is another area school leaders will have to address this summer. Decisions on how to support students when
there are cuts to counselors, support staff and cuts to city social services
will impact how a school responds to students with behavioral challenges,
students who are homeless and students who are truant. Supporting these students along with the rest
of the student body is a complex process.
With less support and security staff, these decisions will become more problematic
because school climate directly impacts instruction. Being sensitive to the challenges that
students in crisis face while ensuring the rest of the student body are safe
and engaged in learning is a difficult balance achieve and maintain with a full
complement of support and safety staff. Combine this with a potential increase
in class size and there is a potential for schools to have major climate
problems.
The
final area to be considered this summer is cuts to student activities. School leaders will consider if cutting
programs such as art, music, and some varsity and junior varsity sports will
produce the financial windfall needed to reduce the deficit. School leaders will also have to consider if
cutting these programs is worth the parental and student backlash that will
occur as a result of cutting these programs.
This summer, school leaders are
going to make some tough decisions that will impact the educational landscape
for their districts. Decisions about
class size, school climate and student activities will greatly impact
instruction and student engagement. Unfortunately, many of these decisions will
not be based on what is in the best interest of the students, but in the
interest of fiscal necessity. At a time
where our public education system needs to become more competitive on a global
level, the summer of unrest may keep our system stagnate or make us further
behind our global competition.
No comments:
Post a Comment